I just got an 8inch 500Mhz Celeron Fujitsu Stylistic LT C500 tablet and GPS antenna. They’re for my newly acquired travel/family car/truck, a 2006 “first-gen” Scion xB. The tablet fits perfectly in the unusually-laid out dash. Figured it would be funner to use a full x86 PC for GPS and MP3s than buying individual units…I’m beginning to wonder if I was wrong…
But anyway, this is an ideal car. More space, less gas! Hurrah!
Box = Roominess & Visibility
The car is 5 feet tall, almost cubic, actually causing an optical illusion where you think the ground clearance is sub-standard. I was worried the front skirt would hit parking place stops and curbs, but it doesn’t. The height also gives you insane leg room. Slide all the way back; you won’t even think about hitting the guy in the back row.
The height also lets you stack stuff high in the cargo bay. One of our requirements was that our 100lb black lab be comfortable in the cargo bay while passengers could sit in the back seats. The Matrix just barely met that requirement, but the old xB fully met it. When you have the 60/40 back seats down, no telling how much you could stack in this car. I predict this will be a worthy hauler in our next move. Frequently, I’ve had the seats folded down to let the dog put his head out the window, and just the huge floor spaces in front of seats easily consumed the bulk of my groceries. This is not a normal small car! The front seat backs can also fold back into the back seats so the passenger can have a lounge chair, or so two can sleep at a rest stop.

Box = Less Weight = Less Gas
The first-gen xB’s 1.5L engine is from the Toyota Echo. When it’s put in this larger car it gives 26/31MPG (new EPA; 30/34 old EPA) (all my EPA stats are for automatic transmission). That’s worse than Corolla / Yaris / Versa / Fit / Civic, but better even than Matrix and everything else, not to mention anything else this spacious. You won’t notice how small the engine is. Most of the time, the light weight of the car (the cube shape again helps by minimizing hull weight), and the great visibility, makes passing fun. I’ve had no problem throwing this thing from a stop into tightly packed 40mph traffic in my morning commute.
2008 Box = Worse than the old one in every way
Don’t go out and get a new xB based on my raving, though. Toyota changed it in 2008 (”second-gen”) so that now it sucks. They decreased the height (they made it less of a cube). They did make it a little longer, but only in the hood. Despite having similar overall volume, you have less space. Decreasing the height gets rid of the phenomenal legroom and some of the cargo room. They also killed some of the crazy visibility. Making it less like a cube removes some of the previously excellent volume-to-weight ratio. Oh yeah, in doing all this they increased the weight by 600lbs.
As if that weren’t enough, Toyota increased the engine to the 2.4L Camry engine. This decreases MPG to 22/28 (new EPA). This is the same size engine as in the RAV4, and Honda CRV and Element, but they are much larger, and able to go off-road to some degree. There are no benefits to offset the lower MPG of the new xB, beyond the sort of better acceleration, which in my opinion is a ridiculous trade-off given today’s gas prices.
Toyota has destroyed the amazing qualities that made the xB the xB! And I’m not talking about the queer appearance, I’m talking about all the wonderful things that you see after you get past that. I think Toyota must not have focus-grouped anyone who actually bought the old xB when they pondered what to change in the new xB. If they had, they would have made something totally different than the new xB and more like the old.
Maybe they would have simply made the hood shaped a little less like a trunk, to increase MPG and decrease the car’s arse-facedness simultaneously. No need to elongate the front, just play with the shape in the wind tunnel a bit. It doesn’t have to look like a brick to match the rest of the car. Instead it should do what little it can to ameliorate the aerodynamic drag challenges imposed by the rest of the car. The Element’s styling could be borrowed from here, or the Nissan Cube’s (see below). Also, if they really needed to, they might have upped the engine, since Toyota’s 1.5L Echo engine has been customised for the Prius only now. But instead of jumping to 2.4, they should have picked the 1.8L Corolla engine. Maybe they’ll rewind and do these better changes for 2010? One can hope.
At least a couple of people agree with me:
– http://s.wsj.net/article/SB118428633736565356.html
– http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/scion-xb-2/
But Wait, There Is Another
Still, there is another hope in the efficient cube concept, in the form of the Nissan Cube. That is, if Nissan doesn’t increase the engine too much when they bring it to the U.S. shortly. The Cube actually came out in Japan 4 years before the xB, so the original xB copied it, not the other way around.
Update:The Cube is Revealed!